Irish Independent – Nov 13, 2014

‘Pharmacy allowed my husband to watch CCTV footage of me buying pregnancy test’

Saurya Cherfi and Ray Managh – 13/11/2014 : 12:08

Wicklow woman sues over incident which she says worsened her already-difficult relationship with her husband

A mother, who claimed a pharmacy allowed her husband to watch CCTV footage of herself buying a self pregnancy test kit, has settled a €38,000 damages claim against the pharmacy for an undisclosed sum in the Circuit Civil Court.


The woman, who is from Wicklow but who cannot be named by order of the judge, said her marriage had been highly dysfunctional and difficult for a number of years before the October 2010 incident which had worsened her relationship with her now deceased husband.

She told her barrister Martina O’Neill that she had bought the pregnancy test for a friend but her husband had managed to find the purchase receipt in their home and had gone to the pharmacy with it.

The court heard that the husband was very possessive and had an abusive and violent behaviour towards his wife. When he arrived at the pharmacy he had pretended to be very distressed and had “tricked” one of the employees into showing him CCTV coverage of the actual purchase.

The husband had told the pharmacy employee that he had found the receipt in his teenage daughter’s bedroom waste bin and was seriously concerned that she was sexually active. This had been why he had asked to be shown CCTV footage.

When asked by Shane English, counsel for the pharmacy, if her husband could have played “a low trick” on the employee, the woman said she could see him playing such a role as he would have been very good at it.

Mr English told the court that the pharmacy assistant was very concerned for the well-being of the man’s teenage daughter and, due to his agitated state, had shown him CCTV footage of a woman purchasing the test.

Circuit Court President Mr Justice Raymond Groarke was told that the father, who had identified the woman as being his daughter’s aunt, had secretly taken pictures of the CCTV footage with his mobile phone. The court heard the woman in the video was, in fact, the girl’s mother and plaintiff in the court proceedings.

The mother told the court she and her husband were not having an intimate relationship at the time and this had led to a row with her husband as he thought she had bought the test for herself.

She said her husband had sent her, on her own mobile phone, a picture of her purchasing the pregnancy test. She had been scared about going home as she knew he would use it as an excuse for a row.

The woman told Judge Groarke that her husband and she had separated on and off. He had been physically and mentally abusive towards her and had been constantly roaring and shouting. The Gardaí had needed to intervene several times after having been called by the couple’s children.

The court heard the incident had not made their “traumatic marriage” any better as the husband had used the pregnancy test purchase as “a stick to beat her with” and had made her life a misery.

“Every day after that he would talk about it any chance he could get. He became abusive on a daily basis,” she told the court.

She said it was like him saying “I caught you.” She had suffered acute stress and depression and had needed to obtain counselling and medication.

The woman said she had complained to the then Data Protection Commissioner, Billy Hawkes, who had found there had been a breach of the Data Protection laws.

The mother had afterwards issued the court proceedings in which she sued the pharmacy under the Data Protection Act for negligence and breach of duty in allowing the footage to be shown to the father.

Mr English told Judge Groarke that if the father had taken photographs of a computer screen, he had done so without the pharmacy’s consent and the pharmacy fully contested the mother’s claim.

Counsel said the Act allowed for personal data to be given to a third party if it was required urgently to protect someone’s health. He said the father had been highly agitated and distressed.

Following a brief adjournment to allow talks between the parties, Ms O’Neill said the matter had resolved. Judge Groarke, who had earlier refused an application by Ms O’Neill for the case to be heard in camera but had made an order restraining identity of any of the parties, struck out the case.

Fintan Lawlor is a dedicated data protection consultant and solicitor at Lawlor Partners